From London to Nairobi: Inside Raphael Tuju’s 9-year loan battle over prime Karen property
Former Cabinet Secretary Raphael Tuju during a past address. PHOTO | COURTESY
Audio By Vocalize
Tribulations facing former Cabinet Secretary Raphael Tuju stem
from a 9-year court battle that docked English shores before commencing in Kenya,
exhausting all the levels of the country’s judicial hierarchy except the Supreme
Court.
It all began 11 years ago; precisely the year 2015, when the
East African Development Bank (EADB) granted the former Rarieda MP a loan of
Ksh.943.9 million to fund the acquisition and development of commercial units
for sale in Nairobi.
The deal, according to court papers seen by Citizen TV, was
given a 24-month grace period, a timeline that lapsed in 2017.
In November 2018, contending that Dari Limited, a company
registered under Tuju’s name, failed to repay the disbursed loan as per the
agreement penned, the EADB filed a case against Dari Limited in the High Court
of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales in the United
Kingdom, with Tuju and his company duly filing a defence to the claim.
In June 2019, the EADB obtained a judgement against the
appellants in London, and filed an application at the High Court in Nairobi
under the Foreign Judgments Reciprocal Enforcement Act for recognition,
registration and enforcement of the judgment in London.
In January 2020, Lady Justice Wilfred Okwany allowed the
prayers sought by EADB ordering for the recognition, registration and
enforcement of the Judgment in London.
Dari Limited unsuccessfully applied before the same court for
orders to set aside the recognition of the judgement.
In April 2023, three years after the High Court ruled in favor
of the admission of the London Judgment, and with the theatre of the
multi-billion case shifting to Nairobi, Dari Limited filed an appeal seeking
orders on the contention that the judgment in London was obtained fraudulently.
Justices Kathurima M’Inoti, Kibaya Laibuta and Gachoka Paul
Mwaniki of the Court of Appeal ruled that the appeal by Dari Limited had no
merit, observing that at the end of it all, the appellant (Dari Limited) was
merely hanging onto technicalities in order to avoid just obligations arising
from the contract of guarantee.
Discontented, in September 2024, Dari Limited (under
receivership) and Raphael Tuju as a second applicant moved to the High Court
(Commercial Division) seeking an order of temporary injunction to block the
EADB and Garam Investment Auctioneers from disposing of properties including
Entim Sidai Wellnes Sanctuary of LR No.11320/3, Off Tree Lane, and Tamarind
Karen and Dari Business Park, off Ngong, Karen of LR No. 1055/165, arguing that
the bank sought to unlawfully recover the monies owed under the agreement.
Lady Justice Njoki Mwangi, in her determination, ruled that
valuation of the agency properties by Knight Frank, a global real estate
consultancy headquartered in London on the 15th July, 2024 can be ascertained,
declaring that the balance of convenience tilts in favor of EADB, allowing the bank
to recoup the facility it advanced to Dari Limited.
A month after the ruling, Dari Limited, Raphael Tuju, his
children Mano Tuju, Alma Tuju, and YMA Tuju filed another suit in October 2024,
seeking orders to prevent the EADB and Garam Auctioneers from auctioning the
properties, and after nearly two years of deliberations, Lady Justice Wambua
Mongare dismissed the suit, allowing the application by the bank and the Garam
Auctioneers.
Tuju, has since written to Chief Justice Martha Koome, complaining
about the conduct of some judicial officers and their integrity, while
questioning the process to grant auctioneers leeway to auction of his property
in Karen to proceed.


Leave a Comment