Uasin Gishu county directed to pay contractor Ksh.1 billion for breach of contract
File image of a street in Eldoret town.
Audio By Vocalize
High Court in Eldoret has ordered the county government of Uasin Gishu to pay a contractor over Ksh. 1 billion due to breach of contract worth Ksh.35 million.
Presiding Judge Robert Wananda faulted the devolved unit for
failing to reply to a suit filed by the company’s director regarding his dues
for the work that he had done.
According to the Judge, the county government was in breach
of an agreement signed between Zedka Technical Limited Company that was legally
awarded the Ksh.35 million tender for the construction of Moiben sub-county
hospital.
The court’s verdict stems from a move by the regional
government to unlawfully terminate a contract related to the construction of
Moiben sub-county hospital in a tender that was awarded to Martin Chemonges Siwa
through his company, Zedka Technical Limited.
The contractor who emerged as the successful bidder for the
county funded hospital project was left in limbo after the county terminated
his contract without paying him the agreed amount for the work he had already
completed on the site.
Siwa, according to the court documents, was awarded the
tender during the 2015/2016 financial year and he had completed 30 per cent of
the construction work before his contract was terminated in what he termed as
breach of pact.
He told the court during the hearing that he stopped when
the county failed to pay the monthly certificate which had been certified and approved
by the Resident engineer appointed by the Ministry of works.
Siwa further told the court that the county never even
responded formally to his demand letters despite repeated reminders.
In its defence, the county government through the Chief
Officer Health, Preventative and Promotion Service Dr. Paul Wangwe said that the
contractor was served with default notice for delay and also for poor
performance.
The Chief Officer brought to the attention of the court that
as by February 14, 2016, the contractor has only done 7 per cent of
construction work, thus way behind schedule. Wangwe argued that in his
professional view, if any payment was to be made, it should be according to
work done and completed and a certificate issued.
Wangwe stated that he was appointed Chief Officer on
February 4, 2016 and that upon assuming office he went through the contract documents
that the contractor was supposed to issue monthly quotations for work done
which the Resident engineer would approve upon liaising with the county
government.
The Chief Officer shocked the court when he said that he
could not recall the date or the amount of money paid to the contractor whether
in full or partial.
He said the work has not been completed to date adding that
he was not even aware whether another contractor has been given the job or
whether any work is ongoing.


Leave a Comment