‘Altars of impunity’: EAC Law Society raises alarm over abduction of Kenyan activists, Tanzanian diplomat
A collage of Tanzanian diplomat Humphrey Polepole and Kenyan activists Bob Njagi and Nick Oyoo. Photo/courtesy
Audio By Vocalize
The East Africa Law Society (EALS) has condemned what it termed the “weaponisation of State and judicial power” in the region following the alleged abduction of two Kenyan activists in Uganda and the disappearance of a Tanzanian diplomat.
In a strongly worded statement released on October 24, 2025,
the regional bar association said it was “deeply concerned” about the continued
disappearance of Kenyan human rights defenders Nicholas Oyoo and Bob Njagi, who
were allegedly abducted in Uganda’s Kaliro District on October 1.
It also regretted the disappearance of Humphrey Polepole, a Tanzanian diplomat and government critic, whose whereabouts also remain unknown since October 6, 2025.
“These are not isolated incidents; they are the visible
symptoms of a broader malaise — the corrosion of constitutionalism and the
quiet normalisation of enforced disappearance and cross-border renditions as a
tool of political control,” the society said.
Citing a recent ruling by the High Court of Uganda on October
22, which classified Oyoo and Njagi as “missing persons”, EALS said the court’s
handling of the matter “lays the writ of liberty to rest under procedural
formalities,” describing the ruling as “morally hollow and jurisprudentially
tragic.”
“The writ of habeas corpus is a constitutional prayer to the
conscience of the State, not a bureaucratic exercise. When courts accept State
denial without credible proof or accountability, they cease to be temples of
justice and risk becoming altars of impunity,” the society said.
“History will judge whether the judiciary is there to
preserve liberty or preside over its erosion.”
In the judgment, the court found no proof directly linking
Ugandan authorities to their disappearance, advising their lawyers to file a
missing persons report with the Uganda Police Force.
The organisation accused regional governments of using legal
and security systems to silence dissent, warning that “the court, which ought
to be the sanctuary of the powerless, is increasingly a stage where procedural
legitimacy conceals substantive injustice.”
EALS argued that the constitutions of Kenya, Uganda, and
Tanzania guarantee the right to life, liberty, and due process, and that
enforced disappearances violate domestic and international law, including the African
Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights (ICCPR), and the International Convention for the Protection
of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance (ICPPED).
“By permitting disappearances within its jurisdiction, the
State violates not only domestic law but also binding obligations under
international law,” EALS stated.
The regional bar further warned that such incidents
undermine the East African Community (EAC)’s foundational principles of
democracy and the rule of law.
“Impunity erodes regional integration; a union of
lawlessness cannot produce a community of law,” the statement added.
EALS issued several demands, including the immediate disclosure
of the whereabouts of the missing individuals, independent and impartial
investigations, and judicial renewal.
It also called on the EAC Secretariat, the African
Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, and the UN Working Group on Enforced
or Involuntary Disappearances to urgently investigate the matter.
“Law without justice is tyranny. Courts without moral
courage become echoes of executive will,” EALS President Ramadhan M. Abubakar
said.
“The enforced disappearance of East African citizens is not
merely a crime against individuals; it is an assault on civilisation itself.”
On October 22, 2025, the High Court of Uganda ruled that Kenyan
activists Bob Njagi and Nicholas Oyoo, allegedly abducted in Uganda on October
1, would be categorised as “missing persons.”
Justice Simon Peter Kinobe said there was no cogent evidence
linking the State to their disappearance, noting that “the State cannot be
forced to produce persons whose whereabouts remain unknown.”
The activists’ lawyer had told the court that they were held
incommunicado at a military facility in Mbuya, Kampala, without trial or formal
charges. However, Ugandan authorities denied any involvement, insisting that
thorough checks across all detention facilities found no record of the two.
The ruling has since drawn criticism from regional and international
human rights organisations.
Human rights groups in Kenya have also demanded urgent
action to secure the release of the two Kenyan activists, whose case continues
to draw regional attention.
The duo had reportedly joined National Unity Platform (NUP) presidential candidate Bobi Wine’s campaign trail before being allegedly forced into a vehicle by four armed men believed to be security agents. Their phones were later switched off.


Leave a Comment