Presidential election petition: What IEBC will be required to explain in court
The Independent
Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) is expected to file its responses
on the presidential election petitions lodged, where the electoral body is
accused of bungling the process and unfairly awarding victory to UDA party presidential
candidate William Ruto.
Among concerns raised include whether or not the IEBC Chairman undermined the Constitution by excluding
four commissioners in the tallying and eventual announcement of the winner, and
whether the IEBC system
was infiltrated to favour the overall winner of the election.
Ahead of the status conference slated for Tuesday next week, respondents in the
case must file
responses between Wednesday
and Saturday. So far 8 petitions have been
filed including one from the main contender in the election Raila Odinga. Also notable are two from activists Khelef Khalifa and Okiya Omtata.
Odinga accuses Chebukati of compromising the electoral systems to favour his
main competitor William
Ruto and that the
results announced were not accurate.
He specifically raises issue with the fact that Chebukati made the
declaration yet results from 27 constituencies had not been tallied and the
accompanying forms 34A
uploaded to facilitate public scrutiny.
In all the petitions, the constant accusation levelled
against the IEBC chairman
was that he usurped the powers arrogated to the commission in the tallying of
the presidential election and deliberately tallying verified and announced the
outcome without the input of fellow commissioners.
Raila Odinga,
the four IEBC commissioners
who rejected the
presidential election results
and a number of petitioners have relied on the 2017 decision in the Maina Kiai case saying Chebukati ought to have involved all the
commissioners in the tallying and verification of the final result before
making the declaration.
IEBC is set
to address the matter in its submissions with the bench expected to clarify the
question of whether the responsibility to tally and verify the results vested
on the commission as a whole or is it only with the chairman.
In a statement released last week, Chebukati turned the tables on the
dissenters instead accusing them of attempting to coerce him to alter the
results and indicate that none of the candidates had secured the constitutional
threshold to force a run off.
One of the main issues IEBC is expected to mount a defense on is the electoral
technology deployed in the August
9th election, the question being did it give whoever had control of it the
upper hand to determine the outcome of the polls.
In
the words of Khelef Khalifa, the commission failed to secure its
systems making it vulnerable to infiltration and manipulation and which
compromised the outcome.
In their petition they:” technological glitches that characterised the August election revealed that
IEBC deployed a
vulnerable and weak technology in the elections hence failing to guarantee a
democratic exercise”
The
integrity of the voter register used in the election will also be on trial. Here Khalifa cites the findings of the KPMG audit which raised
substantive questions, such as were
all duplicated voters weeded out?
In their submission which contained sections from the KPMG reports, they noted the
finding of 481, 711 duplicated registrations noting that by the close of the
audit in June 30%
translating to 144, 674 had not been deactivated.
A further 4, 757 voters had been registered more than once
and only 24% of these had been deactivated. Also, KPMG-flagged
164,269 voters had invalid documentation of which 89% had not been deactivated.
The
petitioner notes that 487,711 duplicated persons was enough to narrow the
margin between the top two and possibly alter the numbers negating the 50%+1
threshold.
And
though the arrest of the three Venezuelans
found in possession of election material had been swept under the carpet after
the inspector general of police and the IEBC chairman casually stated that the matter had been resolved,
it is set to make a comeback in court with iebc expected to lay down the facts
on their role since the issues raised credibility questions.
The commission will also be addressing the trust deficit it
is facing following the split that struck it at the tail end of the election.
Former Attorney
General Prof. Githu Muigai will lead IEBC’s legal team which comprises
lawyers who have worked with the commission in previous petitions.
Want to send us a story? SMS to 25170 or WhatsApp 0743570000 or Submit on Citizen Digital or email wananchi@royalmedia.co.ke
Comments
No comments yet.
Leave a Comment