PS Hinga clarifies COTU’s support for housing policy amid heated back-and-forth
A side-by-side image of Housing PS Charles Hinga and COTU Secretary General Francis Atwoli. PHOTOS | COURTESY
Audio By Vocalize
Housing and Urban
Development Principal Secretary Charles Hinga has dismissed concerns raised by
the Central Organisation of Trade Unions (COTU) over the Affordable Housing
Regulations, insisting that the union has been part of the process from the
beginning.
In a press
statement issued on Saturday, PS Hinga clarified what he termed as
misinformation, saying the inclusion of social and physical infrastructure in
the housing program is not a loophole, but a legal requirement under the
Affordable Housing Act, 2024.
He noted that the
modern approach to housing goes beyond shelter and includes essential services
such as schools, health facilities, markets, and open spaces to support
community life.
“The Affordable
Housing Act, 2024, clearly provides for the design, development, and
maintenance of affordable housing alongside associated social and physical
infrastructure,” said PS Hinga.`
“Modern housing is
more than just shelter. It requires access to schools, health facilities,
markets, open spaces, and other social amenities that support everyday
life."
The PS said COTU was
not sidelined in the process, and in fact had representation throughout the
formulation of the law and regulations through its own nominee, Earnest Nadome,
as referenced in a letter dated March 25, 202 submitted by Secretary General
Francis Atwoli.
“Moreover, the Act
guarantees COTU a seat on the Affordable Housing Board, ensuring worker
representation in oversight and implementation,” PS Hinga added.
“Indeed, COTU-K
voluntarily forwarded Mr. Earnest Nadome's name to be its representative in the
formulation of the enabling regulations, a fact that has escaped the top
leadership of the Workers’ umbrella body."
The PS
subsequently maintained that the Affordable Housing programme remains committed
to delivering 250,000 units annually in well-planned communities that promote
cohesion, reduce transport costs, and improve the lives of workers and their
families.
Concerning the union's
issue with the recent revelation by President William Ruto that the levy would
be used to construct markets alongside housing across the country,
Hinga said such provisions were clearly spelt out in both the Act and
regulations, even dating back to 2018.
COTU had earlier this
week stated: “Under the Affordable Housing Regulations, housing levy funds may
now, erroneously, be used to construct health facilities, pre-primary education
centres, basic education centres, fire stations, police posts, social halls,
markets, and open spaces, under the guise of associated social infrastructure.”
PS Hinga however
retorted: “COTU was represented in person in committees that formulated this
Act and regulations. Even in 2018, the Act clearly said — houses, plus social
and physical infrastructure that make settlements work."
The clarification
follows strong remarks by Atwoli, who earlier in the day challenged PS Hinga to produce evidence showing
the union supported the drafting or approval of the regulations.
Atwoli claimed
that at no time did the COTU Executive Board sit to deliberate or approve the
current housing rules, and accused the government of misusing the levy.
“As COTU (K), we
have never been consulted, either formally or informally, in the development,
review, or approval of the current Affordable Housing Regulations,” said
Atwoli.
“If indeed PS
Hinga claims that COTU (K) was involved, we challenge him to produce ANY
written resolutions, minutes, or official correspondence from COTU (K)'s
Executive Board endorsing the drafting or content of the current regulations.”
Atwoli further
noted that the presence of COTU’s representative on the Housing Board does not
equate to the union’s formal support.
“It is dangerous,
and frankly dishonest, to equate the presence of one individual on a board to
the institutional position of COTU (K). Furthermore, and for the record, Bro.
Nadome has already informed the leadership of COTU (K) that in indeed and in
fact, we as COTU (K) were not consulted in the approval of the said
regulations," he stated.


Leave a Comment