Three Kamiti wardens convicted over terror convicts’ escape
File image of a judge's gavel. PHOTO|COURTESY
Audio By Vocalize
Three wardens attached to GK Kamiti Maximum Security Prison have been convicted over their role in aiding the escape of convicted terrorists.
In a judgment delivered at the Kahawa Law Courts, Senior
Principal Magistrate B.O. found the three culpable, saying their actions posed
a grave threat to national security.
Robert Kipkurui Soi was fined Ksh.100,000, in default to
serve six months’ imprisonment, while Kaikai Talengo Moses received a similar
sentence. A third accused, Willy Wambua, was fined Ksh.200,000, or in default
to serve one year in prison.
On a separate count of organising a meeting in support of a
terrorist group, Wambua was further fined Ksh.800,000, in default to serve two
years’ imprisonment.
According to the Office of the Director of Public
Prosecutions (ODPP) the three were convicted on multiple counts, including
neglect of official duty, aiding prisoners to escape, and organising a meeting
in support of a terrorist group.
“Prosecution demonstrated that on the night of November 14, 2021
and the morning of November 15, 2021, the convicts deliberately facilitated the
escape of terror inmates,” stated ODPP.
Musharaf Abdala, who used multiple aliases, alongside
Mohamed Ali Abikar and Joseph Juma Odhiambo, all of whom were serving sentences
for terrorism-related offences,”
The wardens are said to have deliberately facilitated the
escape of terror convicts Musharaf Abdala, who used multiple aliases, alongside
Mohamed Ali Abikar and Joseph Juma Odhiambo. The three inmates were serving
sentences for terrorism-related offences.
The court accepted the DPP’s case that Soi and Talengo
wilfully neglected their official duties, creating conditions that enabled the
escape.
In Wambua’s case, the court found that he went further by
directly and indirectly aiding the escape and unlawfully organising a meeting
between convicted terror inmates at the Condemned Block “A” by facilitating
unauthorised inmate movement, contrary to the Prevention of Terrorism Act,
2012.
In convicting the three, the court agreed with the
prosecution that the escape was well planned and could not have occurred
without insider assistance, concluding that the DPP had proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.


Leave a Comment