Two charged with attacking, threatening to kill Nairobi businessman
The two suspects who allegedly attacked a businessman at a Westlands nightclub appearing in court on March 27, 2026. PHOTO | DZUYA WALTER | CITIZEN DIGITAL
Audio By Vocalize
Two men have denied
charges of assault and issuing death threats against a Nairobi businessman.
Kibera Law Courts
Principal Magistrate Zainab Abdul was told that Rahiel Daud and Hitesh Motwani,
alias “Vicky,” allegedly attacked Arya Anuj during an incident at Taal Club in
Westlands on March 25, 2026.
According to the
prosecution, the complainant sustained injuries amounting to actual bodily harm
during the altercation. In addition, the court was told that the two allegedly
threatened to kill him in the course of the same incident.
Court documents
state that the accused persons, without lawful justification, uttered words
implying they would end the complainant’s life remarks the prosecution says
amounted to a direct and credible death threat.
In her directions,
Magistrate Abdul observed that the assault charge is grave and carries
significant legal consequences.
She directed that a
pre-bail assessment be conducted before the court can determine whether to
release the accused on bond and under what terms.
The defence,
however, raised questions over the manner in which the accused were treated
after their arrest.
Their lawyer told
the court that although the two had initially been released on a Ksh.5,000 cash
bail at Parklands Police Station, their whereabouts later became unclear before
they resurfaced in court.
Counsel further
alleged irregularities in the handling of the matter, claiming that officers
linked to the Directorate of Criminal Investigations (DCI) may have intervened
in the case.
It was also claimed
that the accused were taken to a site behind Capitol Hill Police Station, where
they recorded statements under circumstances the defence described as
questionable.
On that basis, the
defence sought to delay plea-taking to allow scrutiny of how the statements
were obtained and whether proper procedure was followed.
The prosecution
opposed the request, maintaining that the charges had been lawfully instituted
in accordance with Article 157 of the Constitution.
It also disclosed
that investigators are pursuing a separate case involving alleged malicious
damage to property against the accused, though only the current file is ready
for plea.
The court is
expected to deliver its ruling on bail on March 30, 2026.


Leave a Comment